1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 33 A.3d
  5. 33 A.3d 205 (2012)
 

GRIMM v. FOX

No. 18814.

33 A.3d 205 (2012)

303 Conn. 322

Robert GRIMM v. John Wayne FOX, et al.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided January 10, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Grimm , pro se, the appellant (plaintiff).

Frederick L. Murolo , with whom was Karen T. Murolo , Cheshire, for the appellees (defendants).

ROGERS, C.J., and NORCOTT, PALMER, ZARELLA, McLACHLAN and VERTEFEUILLE, Js.

NORCOTT, J.

The plaintiff, Robert Grimm, appeals1 from the trial court's grant of a motion for judgment in favor of the defendants, John Wayne Fox and Curtis, Brinckerhoff and Barrett, P.C., in this legal malpractice action. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly: (1) granted the defendants' motion for judgment, determining that the critical statements concerning the defendants made by this court in its opinion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases