1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 50 A.3d
  5. 50 A.3d 321 (2011)
 

STATE v. SAUNDERS

No. 32758.

50 A.3d 321 (2011)

132 Conn.App. 268

STATE of Connecticut v. Randall SAUNDERS.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided November 29, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Randall B. Saunders, pro se, the appellant (defendant).

Raheem L. Mullins , assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, were Stephen J. Sedensky III , state's attorney, and Warren C. Murray , supervisory assistant state's attorney, for the appellee (state).

LAVINE, ROBINSON and LAVERY, Js.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Randall Saunders, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, Cobb, J., dismissing his motion to correct an illegal sentence, filed pursuant to Practice Book § 43-22.1 The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the court properly determined that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction to consider the defendant's motion. We conclude that the court properly determined that it lacked jurisdiction because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases