STATE v. BRUNO

No. 32737.

30 A.3d 34 (2011)

132 Conn.App. 172

STATE of Connecticut v. Martyn D. BRUNO.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided November 15, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brian J. Woolf , East Hartford, for the appellant (defendant).

Timothy J. Sugrue , assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, was David Shepack , state's attorney, for the appellee (state).

GRUENDEL, BEACH and WEST, Js.


GRUENDEL, J.

The defendant, Martyn D. Bruno, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion for a new trial filed pursuant to Practice Book §§ 42-53 and 42-54. He claims that the court improperly concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to consider the merits of that motion. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The facts underlying the defendant's criminal conviction are set forth at length in State v. Bruno,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases