1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 29 A.3d
  5. 29 A.3d 183 (2011)
 

STATE v. SOLMAN

No. 32617.

29 A.3d 183 (2011)

131 Conn.App. 846

STATE of Connecticut v. Vance SOLMAN.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided October 25, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Damon A.R. Kirschbaum , for the petitioner (appellant).

Lisa A. Riggione , senior assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, were Michael Dearington , state's attorney, and Sean P. McGuinness , deputy assistant state's attorney, for the state (appellee).

DiPENTIMA, C.J., and LAVINE and ESPINOSA, Js.

LAVINE, J.

In this case, we are called on to decide whether the petitioner, Vance Solman, has satisfied the threshold requirement of the postconviction DNA testing statute, General Statutes § 54-102kk (a), that "[t]he petitioner shall state under penalties of perjury that . . . the evidence sought to be tested contains biological evidence" in order to obtain DNA testing of evidence in the state's possession.1 We agree with the trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases