1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 24 A.3d
  5. 24 A.3d 597 (2011)
 

McCOY v. BROWN

No. 32082.

24 A.3d 597 (2011)

130 Conn.App. 702

G. William McCOY et al. v. James A. BROWN et al.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided August 16, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John F. Carberry , with whom, on the brief, was Timothy M. Herring , Stamford, for the appellants (plaintiff G. William McCoy et al.).

James C. Riley , Greenwich, for the appellees (defendant James A. Brown et al.).

BISHOP, ROBINSON and PETERS, Js.

PETERS, J.

Contracts for the sale of real property often contain mortgage contingency clauses. In this case, the mortgage contingency clause required the purchasers to apply for a mortgage commitment "at the prevailing rate ... and [to] pursue the same diligently."1 The principal issue is whether the purchasers, having learned that they were ineligible for a mortgage at "the prime rate," were required to exercise due diligence to pursue...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases