SCHIRMER v. SOUZA

No. 31788.

12 A.3d 1048 (2011)

126 Conn.App. 759

Robert SCHIRMER et al. v. Antone SOUZA, Sr., et al.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided February 22, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephanie B. Nickse , with whom, on the brief, were Jack D. Garamella and Thomas W. Beecher , Danbury, for the appellants (defendants).

Frank J. Scinto , Southbury, for the appellees (plaintiffs).

DiPENTIMA, C.J., and BISHOP and DUPONT, Js.


BISHOP, J.

The defendants, Antone Souza, Sr., and Dorothy Souza, appeal from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the plaintiffs, Robert Schirmer and Sandra Schirmer, on their claim of unjust enrichment arising out of renovations to a house on property owned by the defendants. On appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly (1) applied the doctrine of unjust enrichment to parties who had no contractual relationship, (2) found that the plaintiffs'...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases