1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 7 A.3d
  5. 7 A.3d 414 (2010)
 

BARTLETT v. METROPOLITAN DIST. COM'N

No. 31231.

7 A.3d 414 (2010)

125 Conn.App. 149

William BARTLETT v. METROPOLITAN DISTRICT COMMISSION.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided November 23, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gerald S. Sack , with whom, on the brief, was Eamonn S. Wisneski , West Hartford, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Jack G. Steigelfest , with whom, on the brief, was Thomas P. Cella , Hartford, for the appellee (defendant).

BISHOP, GRUENDEL and WEST, Js.

WEST, J.

The plaintiff, William Bartlett, appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the motion filed by the defendant, the Metropolitan District Commission (commission), to dismiss his negligence action. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) concluded that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the claim was governed by General Statutes § 13a-149, which requires him to provide notice to the commission,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases