VORIS v. MIDDLESEX MUT. ASSUR. CO.

No. 18281.

999 A.2d 741 (2010)

297 Conn. 589

John G. VORIS et al. v. MIDDLESEX MUTUAL ASSURANCE COMPANY et al.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided July 27, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul L. Bollo, Danbury, for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Jon Berk, with whom was Russell Jarem, Hartford, for the appellees (defendants).

ROGERS, C.J., and KATZ, PALMER, VERTEFEUILLE, ZARELLA and McLACHLAN, Js.


KATZ, J.

The plaintiffs, John G. Voris and Joan Voris, appeal1 from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendants, Middlesex Mutual Assurance Company (Middlesex) and Middle Oak Company (Middle Oak), in the plaintiffs' action seeking a declaration requiring the defendants to provide the plaintiffs with underinsured motorist benefits. This case presents three issues on appeal, specifically, whether the trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases