1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 991 A.2d
  5. 991 A.2d 675 (2010)
 

KAIRON v. BURNHAM

No. 30583.

991 A.2d 675 (2010)

120 Conn.App. 291

Suzanne M. KAIRON v. Bruce E. BURNHAM et al.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided April 6, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald W. Kutz, with whom, on the brief, was Joseph E. Prokop, Portland, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Michael D. Neubert, with whom was Gretchen G. Randall, New Haven, for the appellees (defendants).

DiPENTIMA, ROBINSON and PETERS, Js.

PETERS, J.

Because the requirements for proper medical diagnosis and treatment ordinarily are not within the common knowledge of laypersons, a former patient who wishes to pursue a medical malpractice action generally must present expert testimony to the trier of fact. Dimmock v. Lawrence & Memorial Hospital, Inc., 286 Conn. 789, 813, 945 A.2d 955 (2008). To be admissible, such testimony...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases