1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 986 A.2d
  5. 986 A.2d 290 (2010)
 

TAYCO CORP. v. PLANNING AND ZONING COM'N

No. 18319.

986 A.2d 290 (2010)

294 Conn. 673

TAYCO CORPORATION et al. v. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF the TOWN OF WALLINGFORD.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided February 2, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gerald E. Farrell, Sr., assistant town attorney, for the appellant (defendant).

Timothy J. Lee, for the appellees (plaintiffs).

ROGERS, C.J., and NORCOTT, KATZ, PALMER, ZARELLA and McLACHLAN, Js.

McLACHLAN, J.

Pursuant to General Statutes § 52-593a(a),1 a cause of action is not lost because of the expiration of a statute of limitations if process is personally delivered to a state marshal who thereafter effectuates service within thirty days of its delivery. This appeal2 requires us to determine whether an action can be saved pursuant to § 52-593a(a) when a party delivers the process to be...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases