1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 978 A.2d
  5. 978 A.2d 1158 (2009)
 

MANSFIELD v. A & M AUTOMOTIVE

No. 29834.

978 A.2d 1158 (2009)

117 Conn.App. 428

Alonzo MANSFIELD, Jr. v. A & M AUTOMOTIVE.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided September 29, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mathew P. Jasinski , with whom were Ingrid L. Moll , and, on the brief, David Thomas Ryan , Hartford, for the appellant (plaintiff).

David E. Kamins , Berlin, for the appellee (defendant).

HARPER, LAVINE and BEACH, Js.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, Alonzo Mansfield, Jr., appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendant, A & M Automotive. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) concluded that the defendant did not violate General Statutes § 14-145a, (2) failed to find that the defendant was liable for conversion and (3) failed to find that the defendant's actions constituted a violation of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases