1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 976 A.2d
  5. 976 A.2d 698 (2009)
 

NEWMAN v. PLANNING AND ZONING COM'N

Nos. 18106, 18107.

976 A.2d 698 (2009)

293 Conn. 209

William J. NEWMAN et al. v. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF The TOWN OF AVON et al.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided August 25, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael S. Taylor, with whom were Daniel Jonah Krisch, Hartford, and, on the brief, Sandra M. Bouchard, legal intern, for the appellants (defendant Mary Markow et al.).

Michael A. Zizka, Hartford, for the appellant (named defendant).

Mark K. Branse, Glastonbury, with whom was Brendan Schain, for the appellees (plaintiffs).

ROGERS, C.J., and KATZ, PALMER, VERTEFEUILLE and ZARELLA, Js.

VERTEFEUILLE, J.

The issue presented in this appeal is whether the trial court properly concluded that the named defendant, the planning and zoning commission of the town of Avon (commission), improperly had interpreted and applied a density provision of Avon's zoning regulations applicable to residential lots when it granted the subdivision application of the defendants Mary Markow and Eric R. Secor, Jr. (applicants).1 The defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases