1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 974 A.2d
  5. 974 A.2d 669 (2009)
 

CONBOY v. STATE

No. 17798.

974 A.2d 669 (2009)

292 Conn. 642

Robert CONBOY et al. v. STATE of Connecticut.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided July 21, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel J. Klau, with whom were Joseph J. Chambers and, on the brief, Bernard E. Jacques, Allan B. Taylor and Douglas W. Bartinik, Hartford, for the appellant (defendant).

David S. Golub, with whom was Jonathan M. Levine, Stamford, for the appellees (plaintiffs).

ROGERS, C.J., and NORCOTT, VERTEFEUILLE, ZARELLA and SULLIVAN, Js.

ROGERS, C.J.

This case concerns the proper procedure for a trial court to employ in deciding a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction when jurisdictional facts are disputed by the parties. This interlocutory appeal1 stems from the trial court's denial of a motion to dismiss, on the basis of sovereign immunity, a putative class action brought by the plaintiffs, four state employees,2 to recover...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases