1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 974 A.2d
  5. 974 A.2d 40 (2009)
 

ROSENFELD v. ROSENFELD

No. 29063.

974 A.2d 40 (2009)

115 Conn.App. 570

Daniela Koeppen ROSENFELD v. Roger ROSENFELD.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided July 7, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel V. Schoonmaker IV, Greenwich, for the appellant (defendant).

Barbara M. Schellenberg, Bridgeport, with whom were Neil R. Marcus, Danbury, and Rachel A. Pencu, Bridgeport, for the appellee (plaintiff).

BISHOP, BEACH and PETERS, Js.

PETERS, J.

Trial courts have inherent power to manage their caseloads in order to achieve the expeditious disposition of cases. See Krevis v. Bridgeport, 262 Conn. 813, 819, 817 A.2d 628 (2003); In re Mongillo, 190 Conn. 686, 691, 461 A.2d 1387 (1983), overruled in part on other grounds by State v. Salmon, 250 Conn. 147, 154-55, 735 A.2d...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases