1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 971 A.2d
  5. 971 A.2d 796 (2009)
 

ROGAL v. UTA PETERS RANDALL

No. 29572.

971 A.2d 796 (2009)

115 Conn.App. 89

Hilb ROGAL and Hobbs Company et al. v. UTA PETERS RANDALL.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided June 16, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sheila A. Huddleston, with whom were Glenn M. Cunningham and, on the brief, Lee A. Duval, Hartford, for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Scott S. Centrella, with whom, on the brief, was Jonathan J. Kelson, Stamford, for the appellee (defendant).

BISHOP, DiPENTIMA and GRUENDEL, Js.

BISHOP, J.

The plaintiffs, Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company (Hilb) and Hobbs Group, LLC (Hobbs), appeal from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the defendant, Uta Peters Randall, in an action for the enforcement of a nonsolicitation agreement in an employment contract. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the court improperly determined that the nonsolicitation agreement was unenforceable and meaningless. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases