1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 970 A.2d
  5. 970 A.2d 131 (2009)
 

DOUGAN v. DOUGAN

No. 28711.

970 A.2d 131 (2009)

114 Conn.App. 379

Brady DOUGAN v. Tomoko Hamada DOUGAN.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided May 19, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gaetano Ferro, New Canaan, with whom were Sarah E. Murray and, on the brief, Livia D. Barndollar, for the appellant (defendant).

Gary I. Cohen, Greenwich, with whom were Annmarie P. Briones, Fairfield and, on the brief, Marci Finkelstein, Greenwich, for the appellee (plaintiff).

McLACHLAN, GRUENDEL and BORDEN, Js.

McLACHLAN, J.

The question raised by this appeal is whether the provision of a stipulated judgment requiring the payment of interest, upon default, from the date of the stipulated judgment to the date of default is enforceable. The defendant, Tomoko Hamada Dougan, claims that the court improperly (1) held such a provision of her stipulated dissolution judgment unenforceable and (2) refused to enforce the provision that it previously had found fair and equitable.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases