1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 965 A.2d
  5. 965 A.2d 633 (2009)
 

PAPIC v. BURKE

No. 28698.

965 A.2d 633 (2009)

113 Conn.App. 198

Eddie PAPIC v. John P. BURKE, Banking Commissioner, et al.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided March 17, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eddie Papic, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff).

William J. Prensky, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, was Richard Blumenthal, attorney general, for the appellees (defendants).

BISHOP, GRUENDEL and ROBINSON, Js.

GRUENDEL, J.

The pro se plaintiff, Eddie Papic, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his appeal from the "findings of fact, conclusions of law and order" (order) of the defendant, the banking commissioner.1 In that order, the defendant found that, in connection with the offer, sale or purchase of a security, the plaintiff (1) omitted to state material facts necessary to make...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases