1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 959 A.2d
  5. 959 A.2d 655 (2008)
 

STATE v. PEAY

No. 29052.

959 A.2d 655 (2008)

111 Conn.App. 427

STATE of Connecticut v. Abdul N. PEAY.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided December 2, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Abdul N. Peay, pro se, the plaintiff in error.

Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, were Gail P. Hardy, state's attorney, and Carl R. Ajello III, assistant state's attorney, for the defendant in error.

DiPENTIMA, McLACHLAN and LAVINE, Js.

LAVINE, J.

The pro se plaintiff in error, Abdul N. Peay, brings a writ of error challenging the decision of the defendant in error, the sentence review division of the Superior Court (panel), affirming his sentence. On appeal, the plaintiff in error claims that the panel abused its discretion and violated his constitutional rights in concluding that he had a long criminal record. We conclude that the plaintiff in error failed to brief his claims adequately and to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases