1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 546 P.3d
  5. 546 P.3d 1140 (2023)
 

ANTERO TREATMENT v. VEOLIA WATER TECHNOL.

Supreme Court Case No. 23SA133.

546 P.3d 1140 (2023)

2023 CO 59

In re: ANTERO TREATMENT LLC, Plaintiff, v. VEOLIA WATER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant. In re: Veolia Water Technologies, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Antero Treatment LLC; Antero Resources Corporation; Antero Midstream Partners LP; and Antero Midstream Corporation, Defendants.

Supreme Court of Colorado.

December 4, 2023.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Attorneys for Antero Treatment LLC; Antero Resources Corporation; Antero Midstream Partners LP; and Antero Midstream Corporation: Lewis Roca Rothberger Christie LLP, Kendra N. Beckwith , Frances Scioscia Staadt , Denver, Colorado, Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP, Michael J. Gallagher , James R. Henderson , Kristin L. Arthur , Denver, Colorado, Vinson & Elkins LLP, James D. Thompson , Phillip B. Dye, Jr. , Stephanie L. Noble , Matthew C. Hoffman , Houston, Texas.

Attorneys for Veolia Water Technologies, Inc.: Fox Rothchild LLP, Marsha M. Piccone , Risa B. Brown , Denver, Colorado, Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP, Misha Tseytlin , Chicago, Illinois.

Attorneys for the Colorado Attorney General: Philip J. Weiser , Attorney General, Michael Kotlarczyk , Senior Assistant Attorney General, Brittany Limes Zehner , Assistant Solicitor General, Megan A. Embrey , Assistant Attorney General, Denver, Colorado.

Attorneys for Amici Curiae Colorado Civil Justice League, Colorado Defense Lawyers Association, American Tort Reform Association, DRI Center for Law and Public Policy, and Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America: Evans Fears Schuttert McNulty Mickus, Lee Mickus, Denver, Colorado.

Attorneys for Amicus Curiae Colorado Trial Lawyers' Association: The Paul Wilkinson Law Firm LLC, Nelson Boyle, Denver, Colorado.

Attorneys for Amicus Curiae Colorado Creditor Bar Association: Greenberg Sada & Moody PC, Kimberly L. Martinez, Alan Greenberg, Englewood, Colorado.

JUSTICE HOOD delivered the Opinion of the Court, in which CHIEF JUSTICE BOATRIGHT, JUSTICE MÁRQUEZ, JUSTICE GABRIEL, JUSTICE HART, JUSTICE SAMOUR, and JUSTICE BERKENKOTTER joined.

¶1 In this post-trial original proceeding, we consider petitioner Antero Treatment LLC's ("Antero"'s) assertion that the $25,000,000 supersedeas bond cap set by section 13-16-125(1), C.R.S. (2023) ("the Statute") is unconstitutional. We conclude that the Statute does not unconstitutionally infringe...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases