1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 450 P.3d
  5. 450 P.3d 282 (2019)
 

ALLIANCE v. CAMPAIGN INTEGRITY WATCHDOG

Supreme Court Case No. 17SC284.

450 P.3d 282 (2019)

2019 CO 76

ALLIANCE FOR A SAFE AND INDEPENDENT WOODMEN HILLS and Sarah Brittain Jack, Petitioners, v. CAMPAIGN INTEGRITY WATCHDOG, LLC, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Colorado.

September 9, 2019.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Attorneys for Petitioners: Law Office of Robert S. Gardner, Robert S. Gardner , Laura A. Gardner , Colorado Springs, Colorado.

Authorized Representative of Respondent: Matthew Arnold , Denver, Colorado.

En Banc.

¶1 In this case, we are asked to decide two questions regarding the meaning of article XXVIII, section 9(2)(a) of the Colorado Constitution. First, we must construe the term "violation" as that term is used in section 9(2)(a) and decide whether the "violation" that triggers section 9(2)(a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases