1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.
  4. 96 Cal.
  5. 96 Cal. App. 5th 841 (2023)
 

BIOCORRX, INC. v. VDM BIOCHEMICALS, INC.

No. G061535.

96 Cal. App. 5th 841 (2023)

314 Cal. Rptr. 3d 668

BIOCORRX, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. VDM BIOCHEMICALS, INC., et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

Filed October 23, 2023.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vegh IP Legal, Stephen Z. Vegh ; Amin Talati Wasserman and William Paul Cole for Defendants and Appellants.

Samini Baric Katz, Michael I. Katz and Ignacio J. Lazo ; Katz Law Office, Michael I. Katz and Byron H. Ruby for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

OPINION

The Legislature enacted Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16, commonly known as the anti-SLAPP statute, to prevent powerful plaintiffs from chilling a defendant's valid exercise of free speech rights.1 But the Legislature later observed that commercial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases