1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.5th
  4. 91 Cal.App.5th
  5. 91 Cal.App.5th 1186 (2023)
 

JACK v. RING LLC

Nos. A165103, A165386.

91 Cal.App.5th 1186 (2023)

BRANDON JACK, et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. RING LLC, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

May 25, 2023.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Davis Wright Tremaine, Scott R. Commerson , Rochelle L. Wilcox , James H. Moon , and Daniel H. Leigh , for Defendant and Appellant Brandon Jack.

Hattis & Lukacs, Daniel M. Hattis , Paul Karl Lukacs ; DeNittis Osefchen Prince, Stephen DeNittis , and Shane T. Prince , for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

Ring LLC (Ring) manufactures and sells home security and smart home devices including video doorbells, security cameras, and alarms. Brandon Jack and Jean Alda (together, plaintiffs) purchased video doorbell and security camera products from Ring and subsequently filed a class action complaint against Ring asserting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases