CALAVERAS TELEPHONE CO. v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COM.

No. F083339.

87 Cal.App.5th 793 (2022)

CALAVERAS TELEPHONE COMPANY et al., Petitioners, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, Respondent; PUBLIC ADVOCATES OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

As modified January 18, 2023.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

BRB Law, Patrick M. Rosvall and Sarah J. Banola for Petitioners.

Arocles Aguilar , Mary McKenzie and Tovah Trimming for Respondent.

Lozeau Drury , Michael R. Lozeau ; The Utility Reform Network and Ashley L. Salas for Real Party in Interest The Utility Reform Network.

No appearance for Real Parties in Interest Public Advocates Office of the Public Utilities Commission and Stephen Kalish.


[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

OPINION

The Public Utilities Commission (the Commission or PUC) oversees the California High Cost Fund-A program (CHCF-A), which provides subsidies to small, rural, independent telephone companies that provide

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases