OPINION
YEGAN, J.—
This case illustrates the principle that an anti-SLAPP motion lies only as to "allegations of protected activity that are asserted as grounds for relief." (Baral v. Schnitt (2016) 1 Cal.5th 376, 395 [
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.