1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.5th
  4. 79 Cal.App.5th
  5. 79 Cal.App.5th 1130 (2022)
 

RITTIMAN v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COM.

No. A162842.

79 Cal.App.5th 1130 (2022)

BRANDON RITTIMAN et al., Petitioners, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

June 17, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Office of Steven D. Zansberg and Steven David Zansberg for Petitioners.

David Arthur Urban , Suzanne Solomon , Rachel Ann Peterson , Kathleen Sue Chovan , Keenan Patrick O'Connor and Christofer Charles Nolan for Respondent.

OPINION

This original mandamus proceeding brought under the California Public Records Act (PRA) (Gov. Code, § 6251 et seq.) presents three questions: (1) Was petitioner1 required to fully exhaust the administrative remedies set forth in the Public Utilities Code and in Public Utilities...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases