1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.5th
  4. 78 Cal.App.5th
  5. 78 Cal.App.5th 363 (2022)
 

SAN LUIS OBISPO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COM. v. CENTRAL COAST DEVELOPMENT CO.

No. B304144.

78 Cal.App.5th 363 (2022)

SAN LUIS OBISPO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION et al., Cross-complainants and Appellants. v. CENTRAL COAST DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, Cross-defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six.

May 5, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth, James P. Wagoner , Timothy J. Buchanan , Brandon M. Fish , Lejf E. Knutson ; Best, Best, Krieger and Gregg W. Kettles for Cross-complainants and Appellants.

Richards, Watson & Gershon, T. Peter Pierce , Kyle H. Brochard ; David M. Fleishman , City Attorney, for Cross-defendant and Respondent City of Pismo Beach.

Jackson Tidus, Michael L. Tidus , Gregory P. Regier ; Horvitz & Levy, David M. Axelrad and Jeremy B. Rosen for Cross-defendant and Respondent Central Coast Development Company.

OPINION

A contract by a public agency that exceeds the agency's statutory powers is void and will not support an award of attorney fees pursuant to Civil Code1 section 1717, subdivision (a). We reverse an award of fees against the public agency.

FACTS

LAFCO I

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases