1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.5th
  4. 77 Cal.App.5th
  5. 77 Cal.App.5th 1081 (2022)
 

GROVE v. JUUL LABS, INC.

No. A162276.

77 Cal.App.5th 1081 (2022)

DANIEL GROVE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. JUUL LABS, INC., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

April 27, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bottini & Bottini Inc., Francis A. Bottini, Jr. , Albert Y. Chang and Yury A. Kolesnikov for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, Bruce A. Ericson , Colin T. Kemp and Lee Brand for Defendant and Respondent.

Reed Smith, Raymond A. Cardozo and Elizabeth S. Bowman for Professor Joseph Grundfest as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

Daniel Grove appeals from an order staying his shareholder lawsuit against Juul Labs, Inc., pursuant to the doctrine of forum non conveniens. (Code Civ. Proc., § 410.30 (section 410.30).) Grove contends the trial court erred by enforcing a forum selection clause in Juul's corporate charter that requires...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases