CRENSHAW SUBWAY COALITION v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

No. B309288.

75 Cal.App.5th 917 (2022)

CRENSHAW SUBWAY COALITION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Respondents; HAAS BHCP PROPERTY OWNER, LLC, Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

March 3, 2022.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Strumwasser & Woocher, Beverly Grossman Palmer , Caroline Chiappetti and Salvador E. Perez for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Michael N. Feuer , City Attorney, Terry Kaufmann-Macias , Assistant City Attorney, John W. Fox , Craig Takenaka , Mei-Mei Cheng , Elaine Zhong , Deputy City Attorneys; Burke, Williams & Sorensen, Charles E. Slyngstad , Nicholas J. Muscolino ; Thomas Law Group and Amy Higuera for Defendants and Respondents.

Alston & Bird and Edward J. Casey for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.


[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

OPINION

After the City of Los Angeles (Los Angeles) approved a project aimed at "revitaliz[ing]" a neighborhood in South Los Angeles through the renovation and expansion of an existing shopping mall and the construction of additional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases