GILMAN v. DALBY

No. C066930.

62 Cal.App.5th 873 (2021)

KEVAN HARRY GILMAN, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LENA L. DALBY et al., Defendants and Respondents; TAMMY R. PHILLIPS et al., Claimants and Appellants; ADAM C. THIEL, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

April 8, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Q. Jakob , for Claimants and Appellants.

Dreyer Babich Buccola Wood Campora, Steven M. Campora and Marshall R. Way , for Defendants and Respondents Lena L. Dalby et al.

Kevan Harry Gilman, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Law Office of Joseph C. Maher and Joseph C. Maher II , for Respondent Adam C. Thiel.


[Modification of opinion (61 Cal.App.5th 923; ___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___), upon denial of rehearing.]

THE COURT.—IT IS ORDERED that the opinion filed herein on March 12, 2021, be modified as follows:

The last paragraph on page 20 that begins with, "Second, Appellants assert that Respondents, ..." and ends on page 21 [61 Cal.App.5th 940, advance report, last par.], is to be modified to read:

Second, Appellants assert that Respondents...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases