SAN LUIS OBISPO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION et al., Cross-complainants and Appellants,
v.
CITY OF PISMO BEACH et al., Cross-defendants and Respondents.
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Best Best & Krieger, Clark H. Alsop and Gregg W. Kettles for California Association of Local Agency Formation Commissions as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Cross-complainant and Appellant San Luis Obispo Local Agency Formation Commission.
Office of the County Counsel County of Santa Clara, James R. Williams , County Counsel, Steve Mitra , Assistant County Counsel, Christopher R. Cheleden , Lead Deputy County Counsel, and John A. Castro , Deputy County Counsel, for California State Association of Counties as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Cross-complainants and Appellants San Luis Obispo Local Agency Formation Commission and Special District Risk Management Authority.
Even broadly construed statutes have boundaries. It is the Legislature's responsibility to amend statutes. Courts may not do so under the guise of implied powers.
A city and a developer applied to the San Luis Obispo Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) to annex a parcel of real property to the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
