WYATT v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO

No. C089702.

60 Cal.App.5th 373 (2021)

RUSSELL WYATT, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

January 29, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Chance L. Trimm , City Attorney; Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, Michael G. Colantuono and Andrew C. Rawcliffe for Defendant and Appellant.

Jarvis, Fay & Gibson and Gabriel McWhirter for League of California Cities as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Appellant.

Benink & Slavens, Vincent D. Slavens , Eric J. Benink ; Kearney Littlefield, Thomas A. Kearney and Prescott W. Littlefield for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Foundation, Jonathan M. Coupal , Timothy A. Bittle and Laura E. Dougherty as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Respondent.


OPINION

After the passage of Proposition 218, Sacramento voters approved a requirement that city enterprises providing water, sewer, storm drainage, and solid waste services pay a total tax of 11 percent of their gross revenues from user fees and charges. Nineteen years later, Russell Wyatt brought a petition for writ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases