PLASCENCIA v. DEESE

Nos. B299142, B299925.

59 Cal.App.5th 1148 (2021)

RODOLFO PLASCENCIA et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. CHARLES GYNN DEESE et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six.

January 20, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clark Hill, Pamela A. Palmer , David L. Brandon , Ryan C. McKim ; Gutierrez, Preciado & House, Arthur Preciado and Arthur Javier for Defendants and Appellants.

The Homampour Law Firm, Arash Homampour , Scott E. Boyer ; The Ehrlich Law Firm and Jeffrey I. Ehrlich for Plaintiffs and Respondents.


OPINION

One of the institutional functions of the California Court of Appeal is to opine on whether or not an error at trial has resulted in a miscarriage of justice. (Cal. Const., art. VI, § 13.)1 Here, there has been a miscarriage of justice and we must vacate the $30 million non-economic...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases