LACAYO v. SUPERIOR COURT

No. A160793.

56 Cal.App.5th 396 (2020)

KAREEM LACAYO, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

October 23, 2020.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Manohar Raju , Public Defender, Matt Gonzalez , Chief Attorney, Dorothy Bischoff and William Helvestine , Deputy Public Defenders, for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Chesa Boudin , District Attorney, Allison MacBeth and Natalie Fuchs , Assistant District Attorneys, for Real Party in Interest.


OPINION

Petitioner Kareem Lacayo (Lacayo) seeks a writ directing the trial court to set aside an information based on the court's failure to hold his preliminary hearing within 60 days of his arraignment as required by law. The People concede, and we agree, the court erred. We therefore issue a peremptory writ of mandate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases