1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.5th
  4. 53 Cal.App.5th
  5. 53 Cal.App.5th 1216 (2020)
 

MORGADO v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

No. A157320.

53 Cal.App.5th 1216 (2020)

268 Cal. Rptr. 3d 360

PAULO MORGADO, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.

August 26, 2020.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dennis J. Herrera , City Attorney, Katharine Hobin Porter , Chief Labor Attorney, and Rafal Ofierski , Deputy City Attorney, for Defendants and Appellants.

Murphy, Pearson, Bradley & Feeney, James A. Lassart and Adrian G. Driscoll for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

The City and County of San Francisco and affiliated defendants (collectively, the City) challenge an order requiring them to pay Paulo Morgado for future income lost due to his wrongful termination. In an earlier chapter of the litigation, we granted an alternative writ of mandate directing the trial court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases