RUTGARD v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

No. B297655.

52 Cal.App.5th 815 (2020)

RICHARD PAUL RUTGARD, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

July 30, 2020.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael N. Feuer , City Attorney, Kathleen A. Kenealy , Chief Assistant City Attorney, Scott Marcus , Chief, Civil Litigation Branch, Blithe S. Bock , Assistant City Attorney, and Michael M. Walsh , Deputy City Attorney, for Defendant and Appellant.

Sullivan, Workman & Dee, Karyn A. M. Jakubowski and Charles D. Cummings for Plaintiff and Respondent.


OPINION

California's Eminent Domain Law (Code Civ. Proc., § 1230.010 et seq.)1—and, in particular, Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.245—provides that when "[p]roperty acquired by a public entity [through eminent domain] ... [¶] ... [¶] is not used for ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases