DOE v. MARTEN

No. A153427.

49 Cal.App.5th 1022 (2020)

JANE DOE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. TIMOTHY MARTEN et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

June 4, 2020.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Office of Herb Fox and Herb Fox for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Cole Pedroza, Kenneth R. Pedroza , Cassidy C. Davenport , Zena Jacobsen ; Craddick, Candland & Conti, John H. Dodd and Mary Gannon-McMurray for Defendants and Respondents.


[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

OPINION

Plaintiff Jane Doe sued defendant Timothy Marten for damages sustained after he performed plastic surgery on her face and neck. At trial, the court granted defendant's motion for nonsuit on plaintiff's claim for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases