1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.5th
  4. 9 Cal.5th
  5. 9 Cal.5th 442 (2020)
 

HART v. KEENAN PROPERTIES, INC.

No. S253295.

9 Cal.5th 442 (2020)

FRANK C. HART et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. KEENAN PROPERTIES, INC., Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of California.

May 21, 2020.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

CMBG3 Law, W. Joseph Gunter and Gilliam F. Stewart for Defendant and Appellant.

Maune Raichle Hartley French & Mudd, David L. Amell , Marissa Y. Uchimura ; Kazan, McClain, Satterly & Greenwood, Denyse F. Clancy and Ted W. Pelletier for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

The Arkin Law Firm and Sharon J. Arkin for Consumer Attorneys of California as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

We granted review to determine whether a company's name and logo appearing on an invoice can constitute hearsay. Under the facts presented, a witness's observation of the name and logo was circumstantial evidence of identity, not proof of the truth of matters asserted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases