CALIFORNIA SCHOOL BOARDS ASSN. v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA

No. S247266.

8 Cal.5th 713 (2019)

CALIFORNIA SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Supreme Court of California.

December 19, 2019.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Olson, Hagel & Fishburn, Deborah B. Caplan and Richard C. Miadich for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Jeffrey C. Williams for School Innovations & Achievement as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Dannis Woliver Kelley , Chistian M. Keiner and William B. Tunick for San Jose Unified School District, Grossmont Union High School District, Newport-Mesa Unified School District, Poway Unified School District, East Side Union High School District and Fullerton Joint Union High School District as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Lozano Smith, Sloan R. Simmons , Steve H. Ngo and Nicholas J. Clair for Clovis Unified School District, Elk Grove Unified School District, Folsom-Cordova Unified School District, Porterville Unified School District, Sacramento City Unified School District, San Juan Unified School District, San Ramon Valley Unified School District, Twin Rivers Unified School District, Visalia Unified School District and West Contra Costa Unified School District as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Jennifer B. Henning for California State Association of Counties, League of California Cities and California Special Districts Association as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Xavier Becerra , Attorney General, Thomas S. Patterson and Douglas J. Woods , Assistant Attorneys General, Benjamin M. Glickman , Constance L. LeLouis and Seth E. Goldstein , Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendants and Respondents State of California, State Controller John Chiang and Director of the Department of Finance Michael Cohen.

Camille Shelton for Defendant and Respondent Commission on State Mandates.


OPINION

In 2010, during a period of economic recession, the Legislature enacted two statutes requiring a portion of state funding provided annually to local education agencies to be used prospectively as "offsetting revenues" under Government Code section 17557, subdivision (d)(2)(B) to satisfy two existing state reimbursement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases