1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.5th
  4. 41 Cal.App.5th
  5. 41 Cal.App.5th 77 (2019)
 

RUDICK v. STATE BD. OF OPTOMETRY

No. A152179.

41 Cal.App.5th 77 (2019)

ANTHONY RUDICK et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. STATE BOARD OF OPTOMETRY, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

October 11, 2019.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Craig S. Steinberg and Craig S. Steinberg for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Center for Legal Affairs, Francisco J. Silva and Long X. Do for California Medical Association as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Xavier Becerra , Attorney General, Linda Schneider , Assistant Attorney General, Diann Sokoloff and Gregory Tuss , Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

This is an appeal from judgment after the trial court denied the petition for writ of mandate filed by plaintiffs Anthony Rudick, O.D., and Ridge Eye Care, Inc. (Ridge), and granted summary judgment in favor of defendant State Board of Optometry (Board) and against plaintiffs on their...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases