1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.5th
  4. 36 Cal.App.5th
  5. 36 Cal.App.5th 66 (2019)
 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

No. A153205.

36 Cal.App.5th 66 (2019)

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

May 17, 2019.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Davis Wright Tremaine and Rochelle L. Wilcox for Defendants and Appellants.

Dennis J. Herrera , City Attorney, and Kenneth M. Walczak , Deputy City Attorney, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

Appellants Uber Technologies, Inc., Raiser-CA, LLC, and Rasier, LLC (collectively, Uber), challenge an order directing them to comply with administrative subpoenas issued by the City Attorney of San Francisco (the City Attorney) for reports and data submitted to the Public Utilities Commission (CPUC).

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases