1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.5th
  4. 33 Cal.App.5th
  5. 33 Cal.App.5th 882 (2019)
 

REL v. PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES

No. A152225.

33 Cal.App.5th 882 (2019)

ANGELA REL et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five.

March 29, 2019.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Franklin & Franklin, J. David Franklin ; Law Offices of Anthony A. Ferrigno and Anthony A. Ferrigno for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Drinker Biddle & Reath, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer and Feld, Michael J. Stortz and Matthew J. Adler for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

The trial court dismissed this proposed class action lawsuit because plaintiffs failed to comply with Code of Civil Procedure section 583.310,1 which requires an action to "be brought to trial within five years after the action is commenced against the defendant." The main issue here...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases