1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.5th
  4. 24 Cal.App.5th
  5. 24 Cal.App.5th 855 (2018)
 

MEEKS v. AUTOZONE, INC.

No. E061775.

24 Cal.App.5th 855 (2018)

NATASHA MEEKS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. AUTOZONE, INC., et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

June 21, 2018.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rastegar & Matern, Matthew J. Matern and Sandra M. Falchetti for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Littler Mendelson, Gregg C. Sindici and Philip L. Ross for Defendant and Respondent AutoZone, Inc.

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart and Lara C. De Leon for Defendant and Respondent Juan Fajardo.

OPINION

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff and appellant Natasha Meeks contends that she suffered sexual harassment on the job. She brought suit against her employer, defendant and appellant AutoZone, Inc. (AutoZone), and the alleged harasser, defendant and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases