1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.5th
  4. 24 Cal.App.5th
  5. 24 Cal.App.5th 537 (2018)
 

KROLIKOWSKI v. SAN DIEGO CITY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM

No. D071119.

24 Cal.App.5th 537 (2018)

VINCENT KROLIKOWSKI, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SAN DIEGO CITY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Defendant and Respondent. CONNIE VAN PUTTEN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SAN DIEGO CITY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

May 23, 2018.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Office of Michael A. Conger and Michael Conger for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Noonan Lance Boyer & Banach, David J. Noonan , Genevieve M. Ruch ; The Law Office of Steven W. Sanchez and Steven W. Sanchez for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

Appellants Vincent Krolikowski and Connie Van Putten (collectively appellants) are former employees of the City of San Diego (the City) and members of the San Diego City Employees' Retirement System (SDCERS) who receive monthly pension payments from SDCERS, the administrator of the City's pension plan. Krolikowski...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases