1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.5th
  4. 23 Cal.App.5th
  5. 23 Cal.App.5th 89 (2018)
 

CHARLES v. SUTTER HOME WINERY, INC.

No. B275295.

23 Cal.App.5th 89 (2018)

DORIS CHARLES et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. SUTTER HOME WINERY, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

May 9, 2018.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kabateck Brown Kellner, Brian S. Kabateck , Drew R. Ferrandini ; Esner, Chang & Boyer and Stuart B. Esner for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Jones Day, Frederick McKnight , Charles H. Moellenberg, Jr. , and Kerry C. Fowler for Defendants and Respondents Sutter Home Winery, Inc., Rebel Wine Co., LLC, Don Sebastiani & Sons International Wine Negociants, Corp., Jean-Claude Boisset Wines, USA, Inc., and Raymond Vineyard and Cellar, Inc.

Farella Braun + Martel, R. Christopher Locke and C. Brandon Wisoff for Defendants and Respondents Treasury Wine Estates Americas Company, Treasury Wine Estates Holding, Inc., Beringer Vineyards, The Wine Group, Inc., The Wine Group, LLC, Golden State Vintners, Varni Brothers Corporation, Fetzer Vineyards and Bronco Wine Company.

O'Melveny & Myers, Dawn Sestito and Guianna Henriquez for Defendant and Respondent Trader Joe's Company.

Nixon Peabody and Bruce E. Copeland for Defendant and Respondent Constellation Brands U.S. Operations, Inc.

Morrison & Foerster and James M. Schurz for Defendant and Respondent California Natural Products.

Larson O'Brien, Robert C. O'Brien , Steven E. Bledsoe and Steven A. Haskins for Defendant and Respondent F. Korbel & Bros.

Maranga Morgenstern, Ninos Saroukhanioff and Robert A. Morgenstern for Defendants and Respondents Megan Mason, Randy Mason and Oakville Winery Management Corp.

Winston & Strawn, Erin R. Ranahan and Drew A. Robertson for Defendants and Respondents Sonoma Wine Co., LLC, and Winery Exchange, Inc.

OPINION

Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment of dismissal based on the sustaining of a demurrer to their putative class action complaint under the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986. (Health & Saf. Code, § 25249.5 et seq. (Proposition 65 or the Act).) This appeal challenges the Proposition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases