KANNO v. MARWIT CAPITAL PARTNERS II, L.P.

No. G052348.

18 Cal.App.5th 987 (2017)

ALBERT KANNO, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MARWIT CAPITAL PARTNERS II, L.P., et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

December 22, 2017.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Horvitz & Levy, Steven S. Fleischman , Jeremy B. Rosen ; Fitzgerald Yap Kreditor, Larry S. Zeman and Eric P. Francisconi for Defendants and Appellants.

Freedman + Taitelman, Michael A. Taitelman , Bradley H. Kreshek ; Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland, Robin Meadow and David E. Hackett for Plaintiff and Respondent.


OPINION

INTRODUCTION

The question posed by this appeal is whether a claim for breach of an oral agreement was barred by the parol evidence rule. The oral agreement was made in connection with a transaction by which three companies, of which Albert Kanno was the majority shareholder, were sold to two Delaware...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases