1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.5th
  4. 9 Cal.App.5th
  5. 9 Cal.App.5th 941 (2017)
 

RESIDENTS AGAINST SPECIFIC PLAN 380 v. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

No. E063292.

9 Cal.App.5th 941 (2017)

RESIDENTS AGAINST SPECIFIC PLAN 380, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, Defendant and Respondent; HANNA MARITAL TRUST, Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

February 14, 2017.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Johnson & Sedlack, Johnson, Smith & Foy, Raymond W. Johnson, Abigail A. Smith, Kimberly A. Foy and Kendall Holbrook for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Murphy & Evertz, Douglas J. Evertz, Bradford B. Grabske; Gregory P. Priamos, County Counsel, Anita C. Willis, Karin Watts-Bazan and Melissa R. Cushman, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendant and Respondent.

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis, William R. Devine and Heather S. Riley for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

OPINION

Plaintiff Residents Against Specific Plan 380 (appellant) appeals from a judgment denying its petition for a writ of mandate challenging the decision of the County of Riverside (County) to approve development of a master-planned community put forward as Specific Plan 380 by real party in interest, Hanna Marital...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases