KHAN v. SHIM

No. H041608.

7 Cal.App.5th 49 (2016)

NEESHAT S. KHAN, Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant, v. MICHAEL SHIM, Defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District.

December 29, 2016.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brown Wegner McNamara and Stephen M. McNamara for Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant.

The Goldman Law Firm, Ronald P. Goldman , Ronald V. Good, Jr. , and Kevin Kelly , for Defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent.


OPINION

INTRODUCTION

We are asked in this appeal to examine the propriety of an award of attorney fees in a dispute between parties to a contract involving the sale of a dental practice. After plaintiff and appellant, Dr. Neeshat S. Khan (Khan), dismissed before trial her entire complaint alleging both...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases