1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 241 Cal.App.4th
  5. 241 Cal.App.4th 1 (2015)
 

BEHM v. CLEAR VIEW TECHNOLOGIES

No. H040032.

241 Cal.App.4th 1 (2015)

193 Cal. Rptr. 3d 486

PAMELA BEHM, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CLEAR VIEW TECHNOLOGIES, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District.

As modified October 16, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Grellas Shah , George Grellas , Dhaivat H. Shah and David I. Siegel for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Ropers, Majeski, Kohn & Bentley, Michael J. Ioannou , J. Mark Thacker and Terry Anastassiou for Defendant and Appellant.

OPINION

Pamela Behm asserts that she was persuaded by the false representations of officers and directors of Clear View Technologies (CVT) to invest approximately $200,000 in the company. CVT claimed to be developing "BarMaster," a product that would measure pours of alcohol with such precision...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases