THE INLAND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE v. CITY OF ONTARIO

No. E060022.

240 Cal.App.4th 1140 (2015)

193 Cal.Rptr.3d 55

THE INLAND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF ONTARIO et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

September 30, 2015.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Briggs Law Corporation, Cory J. Briggs , Anthony N. Kim and Mekaela M. Gladden for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Best Best & Krieger, Richard T. Egger , Kira L. Klatchko and Irene S. Zurko for Defendants and Respondents.

Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, Michael G. Colantuono and David J. Ruderman for San Diego Tourism Marketing District Corporation, Greater Palm Springs Convention and Visitors Bureau, Los Angeles Tourism Marketing District, Santa Monica Convention and Visitors Bureau, San Francisco Tourism Improvement District Management Corporation and California Travel Association as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents.


OPINION

I. INTRODUCTION

In 2013, defendant and respondent, City of Ontario, with the consent of defendant and respondent, City of Rancho Cucamonga, established the Greater Ontario Tourism Marketing District (the GOTMD), pursuant to the Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994 (the District Law...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases