PAULEK v. WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL CONSERVATION AUTHORITY

No. E059133.

238 Cal.App.4th 583 (2015)

190 Cal.Rptr.3d 59

ALBERT THOMAS PAULEK, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL CONSERVATION AUTHORITY, Defendant and Respondent; ANHEUSER-BUSCH, LLC, Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

As modified July 17, 2015.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Susan Nash for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Best Best & Krieger, Michelle Ouellette , Charity Schiller and Lucas I. Quass for Defendant and Respondent.

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis, K. Erik Friess and Nicholas S. Shantar for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.


OPINION

Plaintiff and appellant Albert Thomas Paulek petitioned the trial court for a writ of mandate. In the petition, Paulek alleged defendant and respondent Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (the Agency) erred by concluding (1) a particular activity is not a project under the California Environmental...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases